Find, compare and buy robots from top manufacturers

NAO V6 Review: Price, Specs, AI & Verdict

NAO V6 remains one of the most established humanoid robots for education, social robotics and human-robot interaction. In this review, we examine its 2026 price, specifications, AI capabilities, software, battery life, limitations and whether it still makes sense to buy with NAO7 now in development.

Image Credits:
Softbank Robotics

Miguel Anton

Editor

Short verdict: The NAO V6 remains one of the strongest compact humanoid platforms for education, human-robot interaction, social-robotics research and controlled demonstrations. Its advantage in 2026 is not cutting-edge locomotion, payload or onboard AI compute; it is the combination of a manageable 58 cm, 5.48 kg body, 25 degrees of freedom, expressive movement, cameras, microphones and tactile sensing, plus a mature software and teaching ecosystem built around Choregraphe, the NAO SDK and the newer NAO Activities generative-AI layer.


The most important limitation is that NAO V6 is mature rather than new. Its core hardware generation dates to 2018, the onboard Intel Atom E3845 with 4 GB RAM is modest by 2026 standards, current official NAO6 downloads still expose a Python 2.7 SDK, and modern generative-AI interaction is provided through additional software and cloud services rather than a powerful local AI computer. Maxtronics is also migrating NAO6 away from the legacy Aldebaran cloud, which is scheduled to shut down on 1 October 2026.

Best for: schools, universities, coding and STEM programmes, human-robot interaction laboratories, social-robotics research, language-learning projects, special-education research, autism-related research under professional supervision, outreach, exhibitions and teams that value a compact standardized humanoid body with extensive historical research use.

Not for: buyers seeking a modern industrial humanoid, heavy manipulation, autonomous warehouse or factory work, outdoor operation, all-day untethered runtime, state-of-the-art onboard vision-language models, high-speed locomotion, general household assistance or a medical device.

Reviewed and fact-checked 12 September 2026. This is an independent, documentation-based buyer review, not a claim of hands-on laboratory testing. Specifications were checked against current Maxtronics NAO6 product, support and software documentation, current distributor pricing and recent independent research. Historical SoftBank Robotics and Aldebaran documentation is treated as legacy material where current Maxtronics information is available.

NAO V6: Quick Buyer Verdict

NAO V6 should be evaluated as a compact social, educational and research humanoid, not as a miniature version of a modern industrial humanoid worker. It is unusually good at making software visible: students and researchers can write a behaviour, speech routine or interaction and immediately see it embodied through a physical robot that walks, gestures, speaks, listens and reacts to touch.

That remains valuable in 2026. The robot is small enough for a classroom table or laboratory floor, light enough for one trained adult to handle, standardized enough to support reproducible research, and established enough that teaching material, examples and academic literature are widely available. Maxtronics says more than 20,000 NAO units have been produced and delivered, and the platform remains active in RoboCup and human-robot interaction research.

The trade-off is that NAO’s strength is maturity and interaction, not raw hardware performance. The Intel Atom E3845, 4 GB RAM, 32 GB eMMC storage, conventional RGB cameras and legacy NAOqi development stack are far behind the compute and perception hardware found in newer humanoids. Buyers should therefore choose NAO because the use case benefits from its established social-robotics ecosystem—not because it is the newest humanoid available.

NAO V6 at a glance
Decision factorVerdictWhy it matters
Education and STEMExcellentChoregraphe provides a low-code entry point, while the SDK supports deeper programming and robotics work.
Human-robot interactionExcellentCompact humanoid form, speech, gestures, LEDs, touch sensing and a large research history make NAO unusually suitable for HRI studies.
Social interactionStrongNAO is expressive and predictable, with microphones, cameras, speakers and programmable behaviours designed around interaction.
Developer accessibilityStrong, but legacy constraints matterChoregraphe and Python/C++ APIs are well established, but current official downloads still expose a Python 2.7 SDK.
Generative AIImproved in 2026NAO Activities can add generative-AI interaction, but it is licensed additional software and depends on a different architecture from local AI-native humanoids.
Onboard computeWeak by 2026 standardsThe Intel Atom E3845, 4 GB RAM and 32 GB eMMC are adequate for the established NAO stack but not modern local multimodal AI workloads.
Walking and mobilityGood for education and HRINAO can walk, turn, gesture, sit and recover from some falls, but it is not a high-speed or terrain-capable mobility platform.
ManipulationLimitedThe hands are functional for gestures and light interaction, not modern dexterous manipulation or meaningful payload handling.
Battery enduranceLimitedOfficial documentation generally points to roughly one to one-and-a-half hours of typical use, with workload-dependent variation.
Safety and manageabilityGood when supervisedAt 5.48 kg it is much easier to manage than a full-size humanoid, but moving joints, falls, fragile fingers and lithium batteries still require procedures.
Price valueUse-case dependentMaxtronics uses quote-based pricing; a current US distributor advertises a starting price of US$16,990, placing NAO above some newer humanoids on headline hardware price.
Platform longevityStrong ecosystem, ageing hardwareNAO remains actively supported in 2026, but NAO7 is already under development with a new CPU/GPU, sensors, hands and local AI roadmap.

Pros

  • One of the most established compact humanoid robots used in education and human-robot interaction research.
  • 58 cm height and 5.48 kg weight make it far easier to handle than a full-size humanoid.
  • 25 degrees of freedom support expressive full-body movement.
  • Two cameras, four microphones, tactile sensors, sonar, IMU and foot force sensors provide a broad HRI sensor set.
  • Choregraphe gives beginners a visual low-code programming environment.
  • Python and C++ SDKs allow deeper application development.
  • NAO Activities adds a non-programmer workflow and generative-AI interaction.
  • Extensive academic literature, educational material and a long-running RoboCup ecosystem.
  • Current Maxtronics support confirms continued software, cloud and competition support in 2026.
  • Small physical footprint makes multi-robot labs and classroom deployment more practical.

Cons

  • The core NAO V6 hardware generation is old compared with current humanoids.
  • Intel Atom E3845, 4 GB RAM and 32 GB storage provide limited onboard compute for modern AI.
  • Current official NAO6 software downloads still list a Python 2.7 SDK, which can complicate modern development environments.
  • Generative-AI functionality through NAO Activities requires additional licensing and services.
  • Battery endurance is short for continuous teaching or event operation.
  • The hands are not dexterous manipulators and the fingers are physically fragile.
  • No modern depth camera or LiDAR is listed in the standard sensor specification.
  • It is not designed for industrial payloads, production work or outdoor operation.
  • Legacy Aldebaran cloud services end on 1 October 2026, so existing units need software migration if cloud functions are required.
  • NAO7 is under development, creating a real platform-timing question for new long-term purchases.

Our recommendation: shortlist NAO V6 when the objective is education, social robotics or human-robot interaction and the value comes from its mature ecosystem. Do not buy it simply because you want “a humanoid robot.” If your real goal is dynamic locomotion, dexterous manipulation, current embodied-AI research or industrial work, compare newer platforms first. Review the NAO V6 product page and the educational robot category before requesting a quote.

How Much Does NAO V6 Cost in 2026?

Maxtronics does not publish a universal retail price for NAO V6 on its current product page; buyers are directed to request a quote. Pricing therefore depends on country, distributor, support package, software, curriculum, languages and service terms.

For a current public reference point, RobotLAB in the United States lists the NAO V6 from US$16,990. Its advertised package includes the robot, charger and battery, Choregraphe, SDK/API access, curriculum material, an Ethernet cable, a language download and one year of RobotLAB support/warranty. That is a distributor package rather than a universal manufacturer price, so it should not be treated as the global list price.

NAO V6 pricing position in 2026
Cost itemCurrent positionBuyer question
NAO V6 hardwareQuote from Maxtronics / regional partnerWhat exactly is included in the hardware package?
US public referenceRobotLAB advertises from US$16,990Does this package match the support, curriculum and warranty you need?
NAO ActivitiesAdditional licensed product with annual Maxtronics servicesIs the generative-AI licence included, and what is the renewal cost?
LanguagesEntitlements can depend on software state and reseller packageWhich speech languages are included with the quote and account?
TrainingPartner dependentAre teacher/developer onboarding sessions included?
Warranty and supportPartner/territory dependentWho repairs the robot, where, and what turnaround is offered?
Spare batteryOptional operational costWhat is the current price, availability and expected replacement cycle?
Freight and importDestination dependentAre shipping, GST/VAT, duties and brokerage included?

The robot price is not the full programme cost

A school or research laboratory should budget beyond the robot itself:

What can increase the total cost of a NAO V6 deployment?
Cost layerPossible componentsWhy it matters
SoftwareNAO Activities, third-party educational applications, custom integrationsSome of the easiest modern AI workflows are not simply part of the base hardware.
CurriculumLesson plans, training material, teacher onboardingA robot without prepared teaching activities can create more workload than value.
DevelopmentPython/C++, Choregraphe projects, middleware, modern AI bridgesLegacy interfaces may require integration work with current software stacks.
ComputeExternal PC, workstation or cloud servicesAdvanced vision, LLM or multimodal workloads may be better executed off the robot.
OperationsExtra battery, charger planning, network setup, storage caseShort runtime can interrupt classes or demonstrations without preparation.
SupportRepairs, remote support, service agreementsMaxtronics states that users should not service NAO themselves and that spare parts are not sold directly.
Staff timeLesson creation, programming, testing and classroom supervisionThe real cost is often the human time required to turn the robot into a repeatable programme.

How to compare NAO’s price fairly

Do not compare US$16,990 with the cheapest headline price of a newer humanoid and conclude that NAO is automatically poor value. The products may solve different problems.

A modern dynamic humanoid may offer far more torque, compute and locomotion, while NAO may offer the better classroom workflow, smaller risk envelope, mature social-interaction stack and a much larger body of HRI research. Conversely, if you need modern manipulation or reinforcement-learning locomotion, paying a premium for NAO’s education ecosystem makes little sense.

Compare the complete use case: robot, software, training, support, developer access, physical risk, staff skills and required outcomes.

What Is the NAO V6?

NAO V6—also written NAO6—is a small programmable bipedal humanoid robot designed primarily for interaction, education and research. The current Maxtronics specification lists a height of 574 mm, a weight of 5.48 kg and 25 degrees of freedom.

Its humanoid body contains articulated legs, arms, hands, head and pelvis; two cameras; four microphones; speakers; tactile sensors; sonar; an inertial unit; and force-sensitive resistors in the feet. That gives developers multiple ways to build activities around speech, movement, touch, vision and physical presence.

The V6 hardware generation was introduced in 2018. In 2026 it remains commercially supported, but it should be understood as a mature social-robotics platform whose software and services are being modernized around established hardware.

What NAO V6 is

  • A standardized physical platform for human-robot interaction research.
  • A programmable humanoid for STEM, coding and robotics education.
  • A social robot capable of speech, gestures, touch interaction and expressive movement.
  • A low-code teaching platform through Choregraphe.
  • A Python/C++ development platform through the NAO SDK.
  • A platform that can be connected to modern external AI services and generative-AI workflows.
  • A long-established research embodiment used in thousands of academic projects and studies.
  • A practical demonstration robot for events, outreach and innovation programmes.

What NAO V6 is not

  • It is not a modern full-size industrial humanoid.
  • It is not a high-payload manipulation robot.
  • It is not an autonomous employee that can complete arbitrary physical tasks.
  • It is not an all-weather outdoor robot.
  • It is not an AI workstation capable of running today’s largest multimodal models locally.
  • It is not a medical device; Maxtronics explicitly states that its products are not listed under UL/IEC 60601 or equivalent medical-device standards.
  • It is not maintenance-free; falls, batteries, fingers and moving joints require care.
  • It is not necessarily the best value if the project only needs a screen-based coding platform or a wheeled educational robot.

If you are still deciding what kind of humanoid you need, compare the broader humanoid robot market and the best humanoid robots in 2026 rather than assuming every humanoid competes for the same job.

Who Makes NAO V6 in 2026? Maxtronics, Aldebaran and SoftBank Explained

The NAO brand has changed corporate homes over time, which is why buyers still encounter product pages, research papers and software documentation referring to Aldebaran Robotics or SoftBank Robotics.

For a 2026 purchase, the current company to evaluate is Maxtronics Robotics. Maxtronics says it was founded in August 2025 and is now operating the NAO product, software, cloud and support ecosystem. Its current website sells NAO6, publishes the support documentation, operates the new application store and is developing NAO7.

This matters because a buyer can easily land on an old Aldebaran or SoftBank page and assume the software, accounts, cloud services or commercial terms are still unchanged.

The practical 2026 rule

  • Use current Maxtronics documentation for software versions, support and cloud services.
  • Treat older Aldebaran/SoftBank documents as historical unless the same information is confirmed in current documentation.
  • Ask the reseller which company provides the warranty and repair service in your country.
  • Confirm whether the robot is already on the 2026 Maxtronics software/cloud path.
  • If buying used, verify account ownership, software version, battery health and cloud migration before payment.

The transition is not merely branding. Maxtronics states that the old Aldebaran cloud will be permanently discontinued on 1 October 2026. Robots that require cloud services such as the Application Store, software updates or Remote ASR need the new Maxtronics cloud path.

NAO V6 Specifications

The table below reflects current Maxtronics NAO6 technical information checked in September 2026. Some commercial inclusions—such as languages, curriculum, software licences and warranty—vary by reseller and package.

Current NAO V6 technical specifications
SpecificationNAO V6Buyer interpretation
Dimensions574 × 311 × 275 mmCompact enough for classrooms and HRI labs.
Weight5.48 kgFar easier to move and contain than a full-size humanoid.
Degrees of freedom25Supports expressive whole-body motion, but not modern dexterous manipulation.
CPUIntel Atom E3845, 1.91 GHzAdequate for the established NAO stack; limited for current local AI workloads.
RAM4 GB DDR3Modest by current robotics-compute standards.
Storage32 GB eMMCSuitable for the embedded stack and applications, not large local models or datasets.
BatteryLi-ion, 21.6 V / 2.9 Ah, 62.5 WhDesigned for short sessions rather than all-day mobile operation.
Published runtime60 min active / 90 min normal in technical tableUse a workload test; another Maxtronics support page gives 45 min to 2 h depending on use.
Published charging time90 min in technical tableAnother support article states 2 h to 100%; confirm your battery/charger revision.
Cameras2 × 5 MP OV5640Useful for conventional vision and HRI; no standard depth camera is listed.
Microphones4 omnidirectional microphonesSupports speech and sound-localisation workflows.
Speakers2 loudspeakersEnables embodied dialogue and classroom interaction.
Sonar2 transmitters + 2 receivers, approximately 0.2–0.8 m rangeBasic nearby obstacle sensing, not modern 3D scene perception.
Inertial sensing3-axis gyroscope + 3-axis accelerometerSupports balance, posture and motion estimation.
Foot sensing4 force-sensitive resistors per foot, 0–25 NUseful for contact and balance control.
Touch sensingHead, hands and feetUseful for direct social and educational interaction.
EthernetGigabit EthernetUseful for setup, development and reliable network access.
Wi-Fi802.11 a/b/g/nFunctional but not a current Wi-Fi generation.
BluetoothBluetooth 4.0 LELegacy wireless specification.
Software platformNAOqi / embedded GNU/Linux stackMature ecosystem with legacy interfaces to plan around.
ProgrammingChoregraphe, Python, C++Strong learning ladder from low-code to SDK development.
Operating temperature5–35 °CIndoor, controlled-environment use is the sensible default.

The specifications that matter most in 2026

The most important numbers are not height or joint count. They are the compute and software constraints.

An Intel Atom E3845 and 4 GB of RAM were reasonable embedded specifications when NAO V6 was introduced. In 2026 they are not comparable with the NVIDIA Jetson, Orin or dedicated AI accelerators found in newer robotics platforms. That does not make NAO unusable; it changes the architecture. Advanced perception, language models or multimodal inference may need to run on an external computer or cloud service while NAO remains the embodied interaction endpoint.

That can be perfectly acceptable in education and HRI. It is much less attractive if the research question specifically requires powerful onboard embodied AI.

Walking, Movement and 25 Degrees of Freedom

NAO V6’s physical expressiveness is one of its biggest advantages. The robot can stand, sit, crouch, walk, turn, move its arms, rotate its head, gesture with its hands and combine speech with full-body animations.

The 25-degree-of-freedom figure includes articulated head, arms, wrists/hands, pelvis and legs. This is enough to make interaction feel embodied rather than screen-based, and it supports research into gaze, gesture, proxemics, social signaling, balance and coordinated motion.

What NAO’s locomotion is good for

  • Teaching kinematics and motion programming.
  • RoboCup and controlled competition environments.
  • Social gestures and body-language research.
  • Short walking sequences in classrooms and laboratories.
  • Demonstrations where physical embodiment is the point.
  • Experiments where a standardized small humanoid is safer and easier to manage than a 30–70 kg platform.

What it is not good for

NAO should not be treated as a compact warehouse or industrial humanoid. The current public specification does not present it around payload, industrial cycle time, terrain capability, ingress protection or production uptime.

It is also much slower and less dynamically capable than the newest research humanoids. If your objective is reinforcement-learning locomotion, running, rough-terrain mobility, heavy contact or whole-body manipulation, a modern developer humanoid is usually the better research body.

What happens if NAO falls?

Maxtronics’ current user guide says that when NAO falls, the active behaviour is stopped and the robot attempts to recover the last stable sitting or standing posture. If an attempt fails, the robot can remove joint stiffness so a person can reposition it before another attempt.

That is useful, but a buyer should not interpret it as universal fall immunity. Maxtronics also warns that falls from furniture can damage the robot, and its fingers are specifically described as fragile.

Buyer rule: test walking and recovery on the exact floor surface where the robot will be used. Keep tables, cables, stairs and hard edges outside the fall zone.

NAO V6 Cameras, Microphones and Sensors

NAO’s sensor suite was designed around social interaction rather than industrial navigation. This is an important distinction.

The standard platform includes two 5 MP cameras, four microphones, speakers, sonar, an inertial measurement unit, foot force sensors and capacitive/tactile inputs. Together these let developers build activities around seeing a participant, hearing speech, detecting touch, measuring balance and responding with voice or movement.

Vision

The two front-facing cameras support conventional computer-vision applications, face-related interaction and visual research. However, the standard NAO6 specification does not list a depth camera, stereo depth system or LiDAR.

For 2026 buyers, that means:

  • Basic or classical vision tasks can be handled within the existing ecosystem.
  • Modern 3D perception may require an external camera or external compute pipeline.
  • Large neural vision models are more naturally run offboard.
  • Researchers should test latency before assuming a remote perception loop will support real-time control.

A 2024 study using NAO H25 V6 for Colombian Sign Language is a useful example. The research system achieved an F1 score above 90% for its sign-recognition task, but it used controlled framing and lighting and still identified latency as an area needing improvement. That is a much more realistic picture than simply saying “NAO has AI vision.”

Audio and speech interaction

Four microphones and two speakers make NAO well suited to dialogue-oriented experiments, language learning and social interaction. Speech recognition quality still depends on room acoustics, distance, background noise, language support and whether the interaction uses local or remote services.

For classrooms, test the system in the real room rather than in a quiet demonstration area. Children speaking simultaneously, HVAC noise and reverberation can materially change performance.

Touch and force sensing

Touch sensors in the head, hands and feet provide a simple, intuitive input mechanism for games and educational activities. Force-sensitive resistors under the feet help with posture and balance. These sensors are useful because they make interaction multimodal without requiring a screen.

NAO V6 Hands and Physical Interaction

NAO has functional articulated hands, but buyers should not confuse them with modern dexterous robotic hands.

Each hand is essentially designed for expressive opening/closing and light interaction. The current Maxtronics technical table does not publish a meaningful object-handling payload rating, grasp-force specification or precision-manipulation benchmark for NAO V6.

That tells you how the hands should be evaluated: as part of the robot’s social body language, not as production manipulators.

Good uses of NAO’s hands

  • Pointing and gesturing.
  • Opening and closing as part of animations.
  • Light props in carefully tested demonstrations.
  • Teaching joint control and simple motion sequencing.
  • Social interaction where hand movement reinforces speech.

Poor uses

  • Dexterous object manipulation.
  • Reliable pick-and-place.
  • High-force grasping.
  • Industrial assembly.
  • Carrying meaningful payloads.
  • Repeated contact with hard or heavy objects.

Maxtronics’ own unboxing instructions warn that NAO’s fingers are fragile and can be damaged if pulled. That is a practical buying detail that matters in schools: users should be taught how to handle the robot before they touch it.

AI, Speech and NAO Activities in 2026

NAO can absolutely be part of an AI project, but the phrase “AI robot” needs to be unpacked.

The robot’s traditional stack provides speech, perception modules, behaviour control and programmable APIs. In 2026 Maxtronics also markets NAO Activities, an additional software product designed to let non-technical users create and launch interactive activities and use generative AI.

Maxtronics states that NAO Activities requires a licence and includes a ChatGPT licence within an annual subscription to Maxtronics services. The company’s education material positions it as a way for teachers to create activities by writing instructions rather than programming every behaviour manually.

What this improves

  • Teachers can create conversational or quiz-style activities without becoming robot programmers.
  • NAO can become a physical interface for generative-AI lessons and prompt-engineering exercises.
  • Language and social interactions can be made less rigid than traditional pre-scripted behaviours.
  • The robot’s speech, movement and physical presence can make an AI interaction more engaging than a laptop-only chatbot.

What it does not change

NAO V6’s onboard computer is still an Intel Atom E3845 with 4 GB RAM. NAO Activities does not magically turn the robot into a modern on-device vision-language-action system.

For advanced AI, think of NAO as a physical embodiment connected to a larger software stack. A language model may interpret a prompt or generate content; external vision may analyze an image; NAO then delivers the result through speech, movement and interaction.

That can be extremely useful for HRI. It is simply different from a humanoid designed around local GPU inference and learned whole-body control.

Cloud dependence is a buyer question

The 2026 Maxtronics transition makes this especially important. Existing NAO6 units that rely on the legacy Aldebaran Application Store, software updates or Remote ASR need to migrate before the old cloud ends on 1 October 2026.

If your school, hospital or research institution has strict privacy or network requirements, ask exactly:

  • Which functions run locally?
  • Which functions require Maxtronics cloud services?
  • Which functions call third-party AI services?
  • What audio, image or text data leaves the local network?
  • Can the required lesson or research workflow run if the internet connection fails?
  • What account and data-retention controls are available?

Choregraphe, SDK, Python and the NAO Developer Ecosystem

NAO’s software ladder is one of the strongest reasons to buy it.

Choregraphe

Choregraphe is the visual programming environment historically associated with NAO. Users can create behaviours using graphical blocks, combine motion and speech, sequence events and test ideas without writing a full application from scratch.

For education, that gives NAO an unusually broad skill range: a beginner can build a simple behaviour visually, while an advanced student can progress to APIs and custom code on the same robot.

Software Development Kit

Maxtronics currently describes the SDK as providing Python and C++ programming libraries plus APIs for motors, sensors, speech, cameras, movement, dialogue, face detection, sound processing and navigation. It also lists simulation tools, documentation and example projects.

This is a genuine strength. The weakness is the age of parts of the stack.

The Python 2.7 issue

The current official NAO6 software-download page still lists the Python 2.7 SDK for NAOqi 2.8.6, alongside the C++ SDK. A 2024 NAO H25 V6 research paper likewise describes controlling the robot through Python 2.7.18 and SDK 2.8.6.

That does not mean a modern project cannot use Python 3 elsewhere in its architecture. It means buyers should not assume the embedded/official API workflow is equivalent to a current Python-native robotics platform.

For a new university project, decide early whether you will:

  • develop directly against the legacy NAOqi interfaces;
  • use a bridge or service layer between modern Python and NAO;
  • run current AI software on an external computer and send high-level commands to the robot;
  • use Choregraphe for the embodied behaviour while another system handles AI.

2026 connection changes

The March 2026 software update also changes operational details. Maxtronics documents Robot Settings 2.0.2 for current units and a Choregraphe connection-port change from 9559 to 9561 on the newer software path.

This is precisely why a buyer should request the software version before purchasing a used NAO. Two visually identical NAO V6 units may require different setup steps depending on their update state.

Developer verdict

NAO is still a strong platform for teaching robotics architecture, HRI and behaviour programming. It is less attractive if your main goal is to teach a completely modern robotics software stack with no legacy dependencies.

NAO V6 Battery Life, Charging and Duty Cycle

Battery life is one of NAO’s clearest practical limitations.

Maxtronics’ technical specification lists a 62.5 Wh lithium-ion battery, approximately 60 minutes of active use and 90 minutes of normal use, with a 90-minute charging duration. A separate Maxtronics support article gives a broader real-use range of 45 minutes to two hours depending on use and states about two hours for a full charge.

Those official pages are not perfectly aligned, so the safest buying assumption is simple: plan for short sessions and validate your exact workload.

Planning around NAO V6 battery limits
ScenarioPractical implication
45–60 minute lessonUsually workable if the robot begins charged and activity is not continuously motor-intensive.
Back-to-back classesRequires charging strategy, possibly additional hardware or reduced active-motion time.
Trade show / open dayContinuous untethered demonstrations can exhaust the battery quickly.
Long research sessionBattery state can become an experimental variable unless logged and controlled.
StorageBattery maintenance matters even when the robot is not used.

Can NAO operate while plugged in?

Maxtronics’ battery documentation says NAO can be used while connected to its adapter, but the battery charges only when the robot is powered off and connected.

That can help during stationary development, although cable management then becomes a physical safety issue.

Battery storage matters

Maxtronics recommends a full recharge at least once every three months. Its battery-management system continues to consume some power during storage, and excessive discharge can trigger a deep-discharge state that prevents the battery from recharging normally.

For a school that only uses the robot in occasional terms or demonstrations, this maintenance requirement should be assigned to a named person rather than left to chance.

NAO V6 Safety and Operating Limitations

NAO is small, but it is still a moving electromechanical robot with powered joints and a lithium battery.

Maxtronics warns users not to place hands in joints, not to carry or touch the robot while it is moving or standing up, and not to attempt internal servicing. It also states that spare parts are not sold directly and that mechanical damage should be referred to support.

Children require supervision

Current Maxtronics safety guidance says children under 14 must be supervised by a responsible person who understands the instructions. For public environments, Maxtronics says the robot should not be within reach of children and should not be left with them even when switched off.

That is more conservative than the way NAO is sometimes shown in marketing photographs. A school should follow the manufacturer’s safety documentation, not infer permissions from an event video.

Pinch and fall hazards

The joints can pinch fingers. A fall can also damage the robot or surrounding equipment. The safest setup is a clear floor area with no stairs, sharp furniture edges, loose cables or valuable objects inside the movement zone.

Water and environment

Maxtronics instructs users to avoid liquid entering the robot and lists an operating temperature of 5–35 °C. The current NAO6 public specification does not present the robot as a weather-rated or washdown platform.

Treat NAO V6 as an indoor electronic robot unless the manufacturer provides written approval for another environment.

Healthcare is not the same as a medical device

NAO is widely researched in healthcare, rehabilitation, autism and pediatric contexts, but Maxtronics explicitly states that its products are not medical devices and are not listed under UL/IEC 60601 or equivalent.

This distinction matters. A research or therapeutic programme can use a social robot under professional protocols without the robot itself becoming a certified diagnostic or medical-treatment device.

Radio and medical equipment

Maxtronics also warns that radio-frequency emissions can interfere with medical equipment and advises precautions around pacemakers and other devices. Healthcare buyers should include this in their site risk assessment.

What Real-World NAO V6 Research Shows

NAO’s strongest evidence is not that it can do industrial work. It is that researchers have repeatedly used the same embodiment for social interaction, education, language learning, assistive-technology research and human-robot interaction.

Maxtronics states that more than 20,000 NAO robots have been produced and delivered, with deployments in more than 70 countries, and cites more than 3,600 studies involving NAO in engineering and HRI. Those are manufacturer figures, but the independent literature also shows continuing NAO6 use in 2024–2026.

Selected recent NAO / NAO6 research evidence
StudyWhat it demonstratedImportant limitation
Colombian Sign Language learning tool (2024)Used NAO H25 V6 with a neural-network recognition system; reported F1 above 90% for the defined 11-sign task.Testing used controlled framing and lighting, and the authors identified continuous-recognition latency as an area for improvement.
Early-childhood literacy classroom study (2025)Used NAO6 with 25 children aged 5–6, including five with special educational needs; personalized recognition and references to prior interactions supported familiarity and social mediation.Qualitative classroom research; it does not prove that NAO automatically improves academic outcomes in every classroom.
Minimally verbal autistic children study (2025)A randomized study compared NAO-assisted therapy with standard speech therapy in 37 children and reported completion of the intervention without adverse events.The robot was part of a structured professional therapy programme; this is not evidence that NAO independently provides clinical treatment.
Language-learning research (2025)NAO6 continued to be used as an embodied language-learning interface in primary-school settings.Learning design, teacher involvement and application software remain major parts of the intervention.

What this evidence supports

  • NAO remains a useful standardized embodiment for HRI experiments.
  • Its physical presence, predictable behaviour and expressive movement can support engagement-oriented research.
  • The platform can integrate with external machine-learning and perception systems.
  • It continues to be relevant in education, social robotics and assistive-technology research.
  • Researchers can reproduce or extend a large body of prior work using a familiar platform.

What it does not prove

  • That every educational programme learns better with NAO than without it.
  • That engagement automatically translates into improved learning outcomes.
  • That autism or healthcare benefits generalize from one structured study to all users.
  • That NAO is autonomous enough to replace a teacher, therapist or researcher.
  • That a capability demonstrated with external software is built into a standard robot.

The right interpretation is that NAO provides a repeatable social-robotics body. The quality of the result still depends on the intervention design, software, staff, participants and research protocol.

Best Uses for NAO V6

1. Human-robot interaction research

Best overall research use case. NAO’s compact humanoid body, standardized sensors and expressive motion make it well suited to experiments involving gaze, gestures, speech, social cues, embodiment, trust, engagement and multimodal interaction.

The large historical literature also matters: a new laboratory can compare its results with years of previous NAO research rather than introducing an entirely new embodiment.

2. University robotics and AI education

NAO can connect programming concepts to a real physical system. Students can study sensing, state, motion, dialogue, networking, kinematics and human-robot interaction without building a humanoid from scratch.

For current AI courses, use NAO as the embodiment while teaching students to connect modern external models to a constrained physical platform. That limitation can itself be educational because it forces architecture decisions around latency, safety and compute placement.

3. K-12 STEM and coding

Choregraphe lowers the barrier to entry. Students can create visible behaviours without starting with a large software stack, then progress toward more advanced development.

NAO is most valuable when the curriculum is designed around the robot. Buying it as an expensive classroom attraction without staff ownership or lesson planning is poor use of the platform.

4. Social robotics and language learning

NAO’s speech, gestures and predictable turn-taking make it a natural platform for vocabulary practice, language activities and research into embodied communication.

Its value is the combination of voice and body: a physical gesture, gaze direction or head movement can reinforce spoken interaction in a way a tablet cannot.

5. Special-education research

NAO has an unusually deep research history in autism and special education. Its repeatable behaviours and non-human but anthropomorphic appearance can be useful in professionally designed interaction studies.

This should be framed as research or educator/therapist-mediated use, not an autonomous therapeutic claim.

6. RoboCup and robotics competitions

NAO has been the Standard Platform League robot in RoboCup for many years. Maxtronics attended RoboCup 2026 in Incheon with technical support and repair services, showing that the ecosystem remains active.

For teams specifically entering competitions, confirm the required hardware generation, software image, rules and support path before buying.

7. Outreach, exhibitions and innovation labs

At 58 cm tall, NAO is approachable, recognizable and visually engaging. It can speak, move and react without the space and safety burden of a full-size humanoid.

That makes it a strong ambassador robot for open days, science museums, innovation centers and university events—provided demonstrations are rehearsed and supervised.

8. Generative-AI education

NAO Activities creates a practical bridge between a physical humanoid and generative AI. A teacher can use the robot for prompt-writing exercises, quizzes or conversational activities without building the entire dialogue stack manually.

This is one of the most important reasons the old hardware remains relevant: the software layer can modernize the interaction even when the onboard compute is not modern.

When NAO V6 Is Not the Right Robot

NAO should be rejected when the requirement points to a different class of machine.

  • Industrial work: NAO is not designed around payload, cycle time, industrial safety integration or production uptime.
  • Dexterous manipulation: choose a platform with proper multi-finger hands, wrist sensing and published manipulation capability.
  • Modern locomotion research: newer humanoids provide substantially more dynamic performance, torque and simulation/RL tooling.
  • On-device multimodal AI: the Atom E3845 and 4 GB RAM are not a current edge-AI platform.
  • Outdoor use: NAO is an indoor electronic robot, not a weather-rated field robot.
  • All-day mobile deployment: battery life is too short without operational workarounds.
  • Autonomous home assistance: NAO cannot perform general household manipulation or meaningful physical chores.
  • Medical-device requirement: Maxtronics explicitly says NAO is not a medical device.
  • Very low-budget coding education: less expensive educational robots or simulators can teach basic programming.
  • Teams demanding a modern Python-native stack only: the legacy NAOqi/Python 2.7 layer can create avoidable integration work.

A useful rule is: buy NAO when social embodiment itself is part of the requirement. If a screen, wheeled robot, robotic arm or simulator can deliver the same outcome, those options may be cheaper and technically simpler.

NAO V6 Alternatives in 2026

There is no single replacement for NAO because it sits between several categories: educational robot, social robot, humanoid research platform and demonstration robot.

NAO V6 alternatives by buyer objective
Robot / categoryKey difference from NAO V6Best shortlist reason
PepperLarger wheeled social robot with a tablet rather than a walking biped bodyPublic-facing interaction, reception-style experiences and social applications where bipedal walking is unnecessary
Unitree R1 EDUMuch larger modern dynamic humanoid with stronger embodied-AI and locomotion orientationTeams prioritising modern humanoid control, locomotion and developer experimentation over classroom social-robotics maturity
Booster K1 / T1Newer developer humanoids with substantially stronger compute and dynamic-motion focusCompetitions, reinforcement learning, locomotion and current embodied-AI research
Small educational robotsCheaper and simpler but usually less anthropomorphic and less expressiveBudget-sensitive coding and STEM teaching where a full humanoid body is not necessary
NAO7Next-generation NAO under development with new CPU/GPU, sensors, hands, battery and local AI roadmapOrganizations that can wait and want the NAO interaction model without committing to ageing V6 hardware

NAO V6 vs Pepper

Choose NAO when walking, whole-body gestures, compact size or humanoid motion are important. Choose Pepper when a stable wheeled base, larger physical presence and tablet-based public interaction fit the application better.

See the dedicated NAO vs Pepper comparison and the Pepper robot page for a deeper comparison.

NAO V6 vs modern dynamic humanoids

This is not a fair “which robot is better?” comparison. Newer humanoids can have far more compute, torque, sensors and locomotion capability. NAO counters with lower mass, lower physical risk, a mature education/HRI workflow and much more historical research in social interaction.

Choose based on the research question, not the year on the spec sheet.

Is NAO V6 Worth It in 2026?

NAO V6 is still worth considering when the project specifically values a compact, standardized, socially expressive humanoid with mature educational and HRI tooling.

It is much harder to justify if the purchase is being made simply because “we want a humanoid.” At a current US reference price around US$16,990, buyers should be able to explain why NAO’s specific strengths are necessary.

Where the value comes from

  • Established educational workflows.
  • Visual low-code programming plus deeper SDK access.
  • Physical embodiment that is manageable in schools and laboratories.
  • Large research history and standardized hardware.
  • Expressive speech-and-gesture interaction.
  • Long-running RoboCup and developer community.
  • Current 2026 support from Maxtronics rather than an abandoned platform.
  • Generative-AI extension through NAO Activities.

Where the value breaks down

  • If you need powerful local AI compute.
  • If the robot must manipulate useful objects.
  • If battery runtime determines operational productivity.
  • If a modern humanoid development stack is the main research subject.
  • If staff do not have time to create, test and maintain activities.
  • If the robot will mainly sit on a shelf after the novelty period.
  • If NAO7’s coming hardware changes are important enough that a V6 purchase would be obsolete for your planned programme.

A practical value test

Before buying, complete this sentence:

We need NAO V6 rather than a cheaper educational robot or a newer dynamic humanoid because our programme specifically requires ________.

Strong answers include standardized social-robotics research, reproducibility with prior NAO studies, compact humanoid HRI, Choregraphe-based education, RoboCup Standard Platform League work or a proven special-education research ecosystem.

“We want students to see an AI robot” is not specific enough to justify the purchase.

Should You Buy NAO V6 or Wait for NAO7?

This is a real 2026 purchasing question.

Maxtronics officially lists NAO7 as under development. The company has not announced its price or release date, so there is no confirmed commercial product to buy today. However, the preview makes clear which V6 limitations Maxtronics intends to address.

NAO7 is being developed with:

  • a more powerful CPU/GPU architecture;
  • modern cameras and additional sensing;
  • six microphones instead of four;
  • time-of-flight sensors for walking obstacle detection;
  • new hands with finger-pointing capability;
  • a torso touchscreen;
  • a higher-capacity battery;
  • a modern Python API;
  • local on-device AI for computer vision, speech recognition and language models.

Those planned features directly target several of NAO V6’s weakest areas.

Buy NAO V6 now if:

  • you need a robot for the 2026/27 academic year;
  • your curriculum, research protocol or RoboCup work already depends on NAO6;
  • reproducibility with existing NAO studies matters more than new hardware;
  • the supplier provides a strong support and migration package;
  • you can accept external/cloud AI rather than demanding local AI.

Consider waiting for NAO7 if:

  • the purchase is intended to last many years and deployment can wait;
  • on-device AI is a central requirement;
  • modern Python integration is important;
  • better cameras, obstacle sensing, hands and battery materially change your use case;
  • you are not tied to existing NAO6 curriculum or research.

Buyer warning: do not delay a funded project based on an assumed NAO7 launch date. Maxtronics currently says the price and release date have not been announced. Wait only if your programme can genuinely tolerate an open timeline.

NAO V6 Buying Checklist

  1. Define the purpose. Education, HRI research, language learning, special-education research, RoboCup or demonstrations?
  2. Confirm the exact seller. Maxtronics directly or an authorized regional partner?
  3. Request the full package list. Robot, battery, charger, Ethernet cable, languages, Choregraphe, SDK, curriculum and accessories.
  4. Confirm the software version. Ask which NAOqi version and Robot Settings version the delivered unit will run.
  5. Confirm Maxtronics cloud migration. Especially critical for used robots or units purchased before 2026.
  6. Define the AI architecture. What runs onboard, locally on a PC and in the cloud?
  7. Check NAO Activities licensing. Confirm trial, annual subscription, ChatGPT/service entitlement and renewal cost.
  8. Review the developer stack. Decide how you will handle Python 2.7-era NAOqi interfaces in a modern environment.
  9. Test your language. Verify speech recognition, TTS quality and language entitlement in the actual acoustic environment.
  10. Plan battery operations. Define class/session duration, charging windows and storage maintenance.
  11. Review safety. Supervision, fall zone, joints, handling, children and lithium-battery procedures.
  12. Confirm repair support. Ask where the robot goes if a motor, finger, camera or battery fails.
  13. Check warranty. Obtain the actual warranty document rather than relying on a reseller summary.
  14. Run an acceptance demo. Test speech, walking, cameras, microphones, touch, Choregraphe, SDK access and the required application.
  15. Compare with NAO7 timing. Decide whether buying V6 now is strategically sensible for the expected programme life.

Pro tip: ask the supplier to demonstrate your actual workflow—not a generic dance. If the project needs a 40-minute language lesson, Python integration and an LLM conversation, test those three things before purchase.

How to Buy NAO V6

Maxtronics currently sells NAO6 through a quote-based process and an international partner network. Regional distributors may bundle training, curriculum, support, financing or local repair services.

A useful enquiry should state:

  • organisation and country;
  • education, research or commercial use case;
  • number of robots;
  • required delivery date;
  • required languages;
  • Choregraphe and SDK requirements;
  • NAO Activities / generative-AI requirements;
  • network, privacy and cloud restrictions;
  • teacher/developer training needs;
  • warranty and local repair expectations.

Before paying, request:

  • a formal quote listing every hardware and software inclusion;
  • the robot’s software/NAOqi version;
  • confirmation of Maxtronics cloud compatibility;
  • language entitlements;
  • NAO Activities licence and renewal terms if required;
  • warranty duration and exclusions;
  • repair location and expected turnaround;
  • battery replacement price and availability;
  • training and support scope;
  • delivery lead time, freight and import costs.

Review the NAO V6 listing, use the Anton Robots comparison tool, or contact Anton Robots to compare current suppliers and alternatives. If the requirement is not yet clear, start with Find My Robot rather than choosing the platform first.

What Is New for NAO V6 in 2026?

1. Maxtronics is now the active NAO company

Maxtronics Robotics, founded in 2025, is operating the current NAO6 product and support ecosystem and developing the next generation. For buyers, this means NAO is not simply a discontinued SoftBank-era platform; it has an active commercial owner in 2026.

2. A major NAO6 software update arrived in March 2026

Maxtronics introduced a new NAO6 software path connected to updated European Radio Equipment Directive requirements. Current units use the newer Robot Settings workflow and updated security choices.

3. The cloud is moving from Aldebaran to Maxtronics

This is the most important operational change. Maxtronics says Aldebaran Cloud Services will permanently end on 1 October 2026.

Updated robots can use the new Maxtronics Application Store and cloud infrastructure. Existing robots that depend on cloud services need to migrate if they want ongoing Application Store access, software updates and Remote ASR.

4. Current software versions depend on when the robot was sold

Maxtronics’ migration documentation distinguishes between older robots and units sold from 2026. It lists NAOqi 2.8.7.4 for pre-2026 units in one migration table and NAOqi 2.8.7.7 for units sold from 2026, while the NAO Activities path uses the 2.8.8.x software branch.

The practical lesson is not to memorize one number. Ask what version your exact robot uses before following setup instructions.

5. NAO Activities brings generative AI into the current product

NAO Activities is now a significant part of Maxtronics’ education proposition. It provides a non-coder interface and a licensed generative-AI path, allowing teachers to build interactive content without writing the entire robot application.

6. RoboCup support remains active

Maxtronics provided on-site diagnostics, maintenance and repairs for NAO teams at RoboCup 2026 in Incheon. That is useful evidence that the competition and education ecosystem is being actively supported rather than merely archived.

7. NAO7 has been officially previewed

NAO7 is under development with a new compute architecture, better cameras and microphones, ToF sensing, new hands, a touchscreen, improved battery and on-device AI roadmap. No public price or release date has been announced.

This makes 2026 a transition year: NAO6 is still the buyable platform, but buyers now know a materially modernized successor is planned.

NAO V6 FAQ

How much does NAO V6 cost?

Maxtronics uses quote-based pricing. As a current public US reference, RobotLAB advertises NAO V6 from US$16,990, but packages, training, warranty, software and regional pricing vary.

Can you still buy NAO V6 in 2026?

Yes. Maxtronics currently markets NAO6 and directs buyers to request a quote through its sales and partner network.

Who makes NAO V6 now?

Maxtronics Robotics is the current company operating the NAO6 product, software and support ecosystem. Older material may still use Aldebaran Robotics or SoftBank Robotics branding.

How tall is NAO V6?

The current specification lists 574 mm, approximately 58 cm.

How much does NAO V6 weigh?

Maxtronics lists 5.48 kg.

How many degrees of freedom does NAO V6 have?

NAO V6 has 25 degrees of freedom across its head, arms, hands, pelvis and legs.

What processor does NAO V6 use?

It uses an Intel Atom E3845 running at up to 1.91 GHz with 4 GB DDR3 RAM and 32 GB eMMC storage.

Does NAO V6 use AI?

Yes, it can support AI applications through its SDK and external software. Maxtronics also offers NAO Activities with generative-AI functionality. The robot is not a modern high-performance AI computer by itself.

Does NAO V6 have ChatGPT?

Maxtronics states that the NAO Activities subscription includes a ChatGPT licence within its annual services. This is an additional licensed product rather than simply a hardware feature of every NAO V6.

Can NAO V6 be programmed?

Yes. Maxtronics provides Choregraphe for visual programming and an SDK with Python and C++ interfaces.

Does NAO V6 support Python 3?

The current official NAO6 download page still lists a Python 2.7 SDK for NAOqi 2.8.6. Modern Python 3 applications can be integrated through external architectures, but buyers should plan the interface deliberately rather than assume a native current Python stack.

What is Choregraphe?

Choregraphe is NAO’s visual programming environment. It lets users build behaviours and combine movement, speech and events using graphical components instead of writing all code manually.

How long does the NAO V6 battery last?

The technical specification lists 60 minutes of active use and 90 minutes of normal use. Another Maxtronics support article gives 45 minutes to two hours depending on use, so real runtime should be measured with the intended activity.

How long does NAO V6 take to charge?

The technical specification lists 90 minutes, while another Maxtronics support page states around two hours to 100%. Confirm the current battery and charger documentation supplied with the robot.

Can NAO V6 work while plugged in?

Maxtronics documentation says the robot can be used while connected to the power adapter, although the battery charges only when the robot is powered off.

Can NAO V6 walk?

Yes. It can walk and perform a range of whole-body motions, but it is designed for controlled indoor environments rather than fast, rough-terrain or industrial mobility.

Can NAO V6 get up after falling?

Maxtronics says NAO can stop the current activity and attempt to recover its previous stable posture after a fall. If an attempt fails, it can release stiffness so a person can reposition it.

Is NAO V6 waterproof?

No weather or IP rating is published as a standard NAO6 capability. Maxtronics warns users to prevent liquid entering the robot. Treat it as an indoor robot.

Can NAO V6 pick up objects?

Its hands can open and close and support light interactive demonstrations, but NAO V6 is not a dexterous manipulation platform and the current public specification does not provide an industrial-style payload rating.

Are NAO’s fingers strong?

No. Maxtronics specifically warns that the fingers are fragile and should not be pulled.

Is NAO V6 safe for children?

It is widely used in education, but Maxtronics requires supervision. Its current safety guidance says children under 14 must be supervised and warns about joints, falls and handling.

Is NAO V6 a medical device?

No. Maxtronics explicitly states that its products are not medical devices and are not listed under UL/IEC 60601 or equivalent medical-device standards.

Can NAO V6 be used for autism research?

Yes, NAO has a long research history in autism and special education. It should be used as part of a professionally designed research, educational or therapeutic programme rather than treated as an autonomous therapy device.

Does NAO V6 support multiple languages?

Yes. Maxtronics describes broad multilingual support and its 2026 software documentation refers to 21 compatible languages. Exact included language entitlements should be confirmed with the seller.

What happens to Aldebaran cloud services?

Maxtronics says the legacy Aldebaran cloud will be permanently discontinued on 1 October 2026. Updated NAO6 units can use Maxtronics cloud services for the Application Store, software updates and Remote ASR.

Should I buy a used NAO V6?

Potentially, but verify battery condition, joint/finger damage, account ownership, software version, Maxtronics cloud migration, charger, language/software licences and repair support before payment.

Is NAO V6 better than Pepper?

Neither is universally better. NAO is smaller and bipedal, making it stronger for programming, whole-body movement and compact HRI. Pepper is a larger wheeled social robot with a tablet and different public-interaction strengths.

Is NAO V6 better than a Unitree humanoid?

For social robotics, classroom use and established HRI research, NAO can be the better platform. For modern dynamic locomotion, stronger compute and embodied-AI development, newer Unitree humanoids are substantially more capable physically.

Is NAO V6 obsolete?

No, but it is mature hardware. It remains commercially supported and actively used in 2026, while its compute and some development interfaces are clearly older than current humanoid platforms.

When will NAO7 launch?

Maxtronics says NAO7 is under development, but its price and release date have not yet been announced.

Is NAO V6 worth buying in 2026?

Yes for education, HRI and social-robotics programmes that benefit from the NAO ecosystem. No if the real requirement is modern locomotion, dexterous manipulation, industrial work or powerful local AI compute.

Final Verdict: Should You Buy NAO V6?

Buy or shortlist NAO V6 if your requirement is education, human-robot interaction or social robotics and you want a compact humanoid with one of the most established software, curriculum and research ecosystems in the category.

Its value in 2026 comes from being proven rather than new. At 58 cm and 5.48 kg, it is physically manageable. Its 25 degrees of freedom, cameras, microphones, tactile sensors, speech and Choregraphe/SDK stack make it easy to turn code into visible human-robot interaction. Thousands of prior studies and years of RoboCup use provide something newer platforms cannot instantly reproduce: a common research language.

But the weaknesses are now impossible to ignore. The Intel Atom E3845, 4 GB RAM, RGB-only camera stack, short battery life and Python 2.7-era SDK interfaces are legacy technology. The current US price reference is also high relative to the raw hardware capability of newer humanoids.

The 2026 Maxtronics transition improves the picture: the platform has active support, a new cloud path, generative-AI software through NAO Activities and an announced NAO7 roadmap. It also creates timing risk. A buyer starting a multi-year programme today should explicitly decide whether the mature V6 ecosystem is more valuable than waiting for NAO7’s modernized compute, sensing and local AI.

The smartest buying path is therefore use-case-led: define the lesson, experiment or interaction; test it on the exact NAO V6 software configuration; price the full package including licences, support and batteries; and compare that outcome with both cheaper educational robots and newer developer humanoids.

If the physical social interaction is the reason you need the robot, NAO V6 can still be an excellent tool in 2026. If the humanoid form is only a novelty layer, spend the budget elsewhere.

Ready to evaluate it? View the NAO V6 at Anton Robots, compare NAO vs Pepper, or request help comparing educational and humanoid robots.

Related Insights

Reviews

Sophia Robot Review: Price, AI, Specs & Verdict

Reviews

UFactory xArm 6 Review: Specs, Price & Pros

Reviews

Pepper Robot Review 2026: Price, Specs & Pepper+

Reviews

CASIO Moflin Review: Price, AI, Battery & Verdict

Looking for a Robot for Your Business?

Find the right robot based on your application, industry and requirements, or explore and compare available models.

Browse Robots

GET STARTED

Find My Robot

Compare Robots

BROWSE BY TYPE

Humanoid Robots

Robot Dogs

Robotic Arms

Cobots

AMR Robots

AGV Robots

Service Robots

Companion Robots

BROWSE BY APPLICATION

Material Handling

Palletizing

Pick and Place

Welding

Inspection

Cleaning

Delivery

Security

BROWSE BY INDUSTRY

Manufacturing

Warehousing

Medical

Restaurants

Agriculture

Construction

Retail

Education